On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 05:00:28 -0500 "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I think Jeff's actually meaning the other way around. We're confident > through experience of the utility of the single revnos. We're NOT (at > least, I'm not) so convinced of the utility and usability of the > dotted ones; they haven't gone through the crucible of experience yet. > Yes, that's the way I took what he said as well. Bzr revnos (dotted or otherwise) can not be guaranteed to be stable in a truly distributed system. Now it's clear that you folks just don't really care about that and you're happy enough that they work out fine for your uses. That's a fair enough decision to make; there's no law that says you have to care about the situations where there will be clashes and/or the numbers will change. Git makes a different choice, and for my money it's a better choice. Cheers, Sean - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html