Re: VCS comparison table

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 23:23:37 -0400
Jeff Licquia <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > The archives have all the posts of people claiming that there were no
> > issues with revno's and fully distributed models.  
> 
> "revno's"?  Which "revno's"? ...
> 
> OK.  So you are conflating the two.  Could someone who isn't comment?

No, actually i'm not.  Single revno's or your dotted revno's _both_ have the
same property.  They can only be local data and can not guarantee stability
in a fully distributed environment.

Sean
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]