Re: VCS comparison table

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 20:46:45 -0400
Jeff Licquia <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Which opinion is this?  The opinion that old-style local revnos aren't a
> big deal, or that new-style dotted revnos aren't a big deal?
> 
> I suspect you're conflating the two, and interpreting certainty for the
> former as certainty for the latter.  Though I don't mind being
> corrected.

The archives have all the posts of people claiming that there were no
issues with revno's and fully distributed models.  But it's okay, the
issue really isn't all that important in the big scheme of things.  Bzr
and Git have much more in common than they have differences.  I reject
that revno's are an example of where bzr is superior than Git, but
there are no doubt examples where I would concede that bzr has the edge.

Cheers,
Sean
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]