Re: Git log follow question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> If we want --follow and --parent to work together, you'd need to move the
> special rename hack to be in the early phases. I'm sure it's possible. It
> might even be reasonably simple. But it's very fundamentally not what we
> do now.
...
> It would
> be nice if "gitk --follow <pathname>" worked properly, but it's just not
> something I care very much about.

Putting the internal machinery aside, it would be enormously useful
for the end user.

The Linux kernel is unusual in that there are relatively few renames /
reorgs in the mainline -- maintainers pushback and force those things
to happen before a patchset is merged. And you (as the lead
maintainer) probably know all the renames in your own project.

The use case for this is: "Where the hell does this WTF-worthy
function come from, in this WTF-esque old codebase I just inherited?"

cheers,


m
-- 
 martin.langhoff@xxxxxxxxx
 martin@xxxxxxxxxx -- School Server Architect
 - ask interesting questions
 - don't get distracted with shiny stuff  - working code first
 - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]