On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 19:42:47 -0400, Jeff Licquia wrote: > I don't think so. Recently, I've been trying to track a particular > patch in the kernel. It was done as a series of commits, and probably > would have been its own branch in bzr, but when I was trying to group > the commits together to analyze them as a group, the easiest way to do > that was by the original committer's name. As far as "its own branch in bzr" would such a branch remain available indefinitely even after being merged in to the main tree? > Now, there's probably a better way to hunt that stuff down, but in this > case hunting the user down worked for me. (It may have made a > difference that I was using gitweb instead of a local clone.) Vast, huge, gaping, cosmic difference. Almost none of the power of git is exposed by gitweb. It's really not worth comparing. (Now a gitweb-alike that provided all the kinds of very easy browsing and filtering of the history like gitk and git might be nice to have.) -Carl
Attachment:
pgpKfxANEVgYr.pgp
Description: PGP signature