On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 16:05:18 -0400 Aaron Bentley <aaron.bentley@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Our experience really is that it does work. Of course it works as long as you accept the implicit requirements of supporting them and ignore the cases where they change out from underneath the user. But as soon as users want to embrace distributive models where there isn't a central shared repo, at best revno's are unhelpful and at worst they are counterproductive. The proof of this is that if revno's were sufficient bzr wouldn't need revid's. Since the utility provided by revno's seems so minimal even in the case where they do work, Git simply doesn't bother with them. And "our" experience is that Git really does work well without them. Sean - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html