Hi David, On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 9:08 AM, David Michael Barr <david.barr@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I was working on a slow but reliable alternate implementation for > validation and regression testing. So far, it seems really hard to write > anything reliable atop Subversion. Okay. I won't really touch that because I'm not very fluent in Perl. > I know its bad form, but I've done what I promise is the last history > manipulation on my public repository. Now that the code is at a point > that is quite functional and ready to receive contributions, I've signed > off on my own commits and reviewed the history. On a related note, we might also want to benchmark it against alternatives and make the benchmarks public for the 1.0 release. > On that note, do you think I should rewrite my history to include > 'signed-off' or any other cleanup before I start accepting patches? Yeah, I don't think we should have a problem with non-FF updates, atleast until the project reaches 1.0 and becomes more public. -- Ram -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html