Am 5/8/2010 18:39, schrieb Andreas Hartmetz: > On Friday 07 May 2010 09:20:15 Johannes Sixt wrote: >> But what is wrong with "start-point"? It precisely conveys the meaning of >> the parameter. >> > Look at -f: as far as I understand it moves the branch *head*, so start-point > is plain wrong. The "root" of the branch is not moved, or only moved > indirectly (not sure if the latter is allowed). Huh? The purpose of -f is not to *move* a branch head, but to say "trust me, I know what I'm doing". Why would "start-point" not be suitable in this case? -- Hannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html