Re: [PATCH] blame: add a range option to -L

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano writes:
> 
 
> I am not interested in this patch very much myself, and after thinking
> about it, I think my dislike largely comes from this syntax, and not from
> the feature itself.  Any non-punctuation letter there looks like a sore
> thumb.  Either "-L 20??15" or even "-L 20+/-5" would have looked a _lo=
> t_
> saner.
> 

Ok, I've never been thrilled with the r either, but I couldn't come up
with anything better and I had assumed that you'd want to stick with
the <start>,<end> syntax.

-- 
Bill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]