Re: Migrating from subversion via git svn contains log entry, but not the file change in the branch.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Answer to list failed, so typing it in forum instead.


Michael J Gruber-2 wrote:
> 
> magnuspalmer venit, vidit, dixit 03.05.2010 14:25:
>> 
>> I've been working almost fulltime for two weeks migrating a subversion
>> repository to git.
>> Most repos go fine, but some doesn't and I'm running out of options.
>> 
>> Been trying to find posts regarding this and tried what I've found.
>> 
>> The subversion repo contains subrepos.
>> Layout is this:
>> tags
>> branches
>> <trunk is in root dir, contains only a maven pom.xml>
>> subrepo-a(with standard layout: trunk, tags, branches)
>> subrepo-n
>> 
>> Team is doing ongoing development in currently four branches (develop,
>> release-product-a-1.1, release-product-b-1.0, trunk). I'll deal with that
>> later.
>> 
>> What happends is that I get the svn log message, but the file is not the
>> correct one, or the file is completely missing suddenly.
>> git checkout develop
>> HEAD is now at 5269d17... increased version to 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT.
>> 
>> The change in the file is not there, the old version number in the
>> pom.xml.
>> I compare this with the one checkout out via svn.
>> 
>> git svn init --trunk='' --tags=tags/*/* --branches=branches --prefix=svn/
> 
> What is the reason for the tags/*/*? I would expect a simple --tags=tags
> here.
> 
>>> they have for some reason tags/internal-delivery and tags/delivery
> 
>> --ignore-paths="branches|tags|subrepo-a|subrepo-b|"
>> https://example.com/svn/theproject/client
>> 
>> Then I've tried:
>> git fetch
>> git fetch --no-follow-parent
> 
> git svn that, I assume.
> 
>>> Yes, it is git svn of course. 
> 
>> turn on/off brokensymlink workaround
>> git config svn.brokenSymlinkWorkaround false
>> git config svn.brokenSymlinkWorkaround true
> 
> Do you use symlinks?
> 
>>> Don't know, I am off site the current team that will move to this
>>> location.
>>> Since they use windows workstations I doubt it.
> 
>> Also started at different revisions
>> -r XYZ:HEAD
>> 
>> For one of the cases (with svn.brokenSymlinkWorkaround=false) I get:
>> Found possible branch point:
>> https://example.com/svn/theproject/client/branches/develop/pom.xml =>
>> https://example.com/svn/theproject/client/branches/release-1.1.0, 10623
>> Initializing parent: release-1.1.0@10623
>> W: Ignoring error from SVN, path probably does not exist: (160013):
>> Filesystem has no item: File not found: revision 6973, path
>> '/theproject/client/branches/develop/pom.xml'
>> 
>> And I end up with a:
>> remotes/release-1.1.0
>> remotes/release-1.1.0@10623
>> 
>> Any ideas of how to proceed?
>> I am getting short out of ideas.
> 
> I assume you can't make that repo accessible, can you?
> 
>>> No, unfortunately :(
>>> It was hard getting access myself.
>>> It is a team of consultants moving from offsite contracting to inhouse
>>> development. Same team though.
> 
> Michael
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://git.661346.n2.nabble.com/Migrating-from-subversion-via-git-svn-contains-log-entry-but-not-the-file-change-in-the-branch-tp4997493p4997630.html
Sent from the git mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]