Re: Proper way to abort incorrect cherry-picking?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 3:49 PM, David Borowitz <dborowitz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 12:38, Eugene Sajine <euguess@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> hi,
>>
>> we have tried to cherry-pick 2 commits from one branch to another
>> branch, but unfortunately the incorrect commit was chosen to be
>> applied first.
>>
>> Thus, the automatic cherry-pick failed and caused conflicts, so in
>> order to to cancel the whole operation i had to do the following:
>>
>> 1. mark the conflicting files as resolved (without even resolving
>> them) by doing git add.
>> 2. unstage all files staged for commit as a result of incomplete cherry picking
>> 3. manually checkout touched files to their correct state (git checkout file)
>>
>> and then i was able to repeat cherry-picking with correct commits.
>>
>> Is there a better way?
>
> git reset --hard HEAD@{1}?

not always working. In our particular case there were some local
modifications to other files, which would be blown away with this for
no reason. That's why I went the long way of resetting specific files.

Thanks,
Eugene
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]