Dear diary, on Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 01:24:51AM CEST, I got a letter where Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> said that... > Robert Collins wrote: > > > However, I'm still convinced that tracking the user intention of renames > > leads to a slicker system than renames via inference. > > Well, there was (abandoned for now) idea of rr2-cache, the cache of how > renames were resolved during merge conflict resolving. Is that really relevant? It rather seems something like rerere, which is handy, but only if you are the one who is actually supposed to have clue on how should it be resolved; the caches aren't replicated on clones. -- Petr "Pasky" Baudis Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/ #!/bin/perl -sp0777i<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<j]dsj $/=unpack('H*',$_);$_=`echo 16dio\U$k"SK$/SM$n\EsN0p[lN*1 lK[d2%Sa2/d0$^Ixp"|dc`;s/\W//g;$_=pack('H*',/((..)*)$/) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html