Re: 'commit -a' safety (was: Re: Please default to 'commit -a' when no changes were added)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 11:54, Petr Baudis <pasky@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Are there valid user scenarios where you customize your index, then want
> to override that using -a without thinking twice?
>

Depends on what you consider "customizing your index".  I add files to
the index all the time as I'm working on things, then commit -a at the
end "without thinking twice".

For example:
1) Hack on something.
2) git add $thing
3) Run full test-suite.
4) Fix a failing module.
5) git add $fixed-module-and-tests
6) Repeat 3-5 until there's only one module failing.
7) Fix last failing module.
8) git commit -a

I doubt I'm the only one that stages things as a way of marking them
as "done", and using git commit -a to "check-off" the last "todo"
item.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]