[PATCH 3/3] Permit tests to be run as a (fake) root user

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Skip tests that require sane behavior wrt permissions if the current
uid is 0.

So now if you run

  fakeroot sh -c '
	make all test install install-doc prefix=/usr/local \
		DESTDIR=wherever >packaged-git.log 2>&1 &&
	cd wherever &&
	tar -cf - . |
	gzip
  ' >packaged-git.tar.gz

then this should successfully build a binary tarball for git, running
some tests while at it.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 Goals
 -----
 Before the POSIXPERM mechanism existed (which makes this change too
 easy to avoid considering), I think many people wanted to discourage
 running tests as root to avoid hosing people’s machines.  Which makes
 some sense.
 
 But it is possible and may even be valuable to run tests in a
 sandbox. [1] [8] If that were the only reason to run tests as root, I
 would suggest requiring some particular environment variable to be
 set as a safety.
 
 In Debian, I think it might be policy to allow building as “root”.  In
 this context, that almost always happens through some sort of ptrace or
 LD_PRELOAD hack like fakeroot.  If a user knows to, it is easy to fall
 back to building as an unprivileged user, but really I think a user
 should not have to know to. [2] [3]  If some non-POSIXPERM test fails
 when run as (fake) root, that is something that would be nice to
 know. [4]
 
 Which prerequisite?
 -------------------
 It is possible to use autoconf-style tests to check for each
 capability we would like to lack. [5]  Certainly, POSIXPERM does not
 actually describe the exact set of abilities one gains by running as
 an unprivileged user. [6]  But unsetting POSIXPERM does successfully
 convey a simple truth: if you run tests as root, you have lost the ability
 to pay attention to permissions and keep your sanity. [7]
 
 [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/86885/focus=87664
 [2] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/140128
 [3] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/17904/focus=17910
 [4] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/75561/focus=75568
 [5] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/18667
 [6] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/121502/focus=121531
 [7] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/116729/focus=118385
 [8] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/52654/focus=52689
     Holy cow, that Solaris bug is still not fixed [9].  Maybe it
     would be worthwhile to make an unlink() wrapper in compat/ to
     avoid new uses leaving users on such operating systems in danger.
 [9] http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6581318

Thanks for reading.  I hope the story was not too dull.

 t/test-lib.sh |    5 ++++-
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/t/test-lib.sh b/t/test-lib.sh
index a53b6cf..0f51757 100644
--- a/t/test-lib.sh
+++ b/t/test-lib.sh
@@ -782,7 +782,10 @@ case $(uname -s) in
 	# exec does not inherit the PID
 	;;
 *)
-	test_set_prereq POSIXPERM
+	if test $(id -u) != 0
+	then
+		test_set_prereq POSIXPERM
+	fi
 	test_set_prereq BSLASHPSPEC
 	test_set_prereq EXECKEEPSPID
 	;;
-- 
1.7.1.rc1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]