Hi, > barring any comment from Junio, I think a fixup is probably more > onerous than a resend with the fixup squashed in; that is, assuming > the old iteration is already git-am'ed in, and the fixup applies onto > a new iteration. I'll clarify. The fixup applies to `d8e255cb385365` in `pu`. The thread begins with a patch generated from this commit: the commit is stalled in `pu` due to lack of acks. -- Ram -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html