On Thu, 15 Apr 2010, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > > > I think another way of addressing the same problem would be to redefine > > "reachable" in this context as "reachable from any current ref". > > I tend to agree, but I haven't thought through the case for entries that > point at commits on detached HEAD. My gut feeling is that unless they are > connected to a real ref by now after all these expireunreachable days, > they are "failed experiments" and deserve to get pruned, so "from any ref" > would probably work well for them. I'm a bit worried about this discussion. What's the point of having a reflog for unreachable stuff if it is to be pruned faster than stuff that is already reachable without any reflog? Nicolas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html