On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 11:58:27AM +0200, Michael J Gruber wrote: > Christian Halstrick venit, vidit, dixit 15.04.2010 11:51: > > But still, Git should be able to deal with broken servers. The problem > is: If the server does not report any problem but simply serves a broken > pack (with correct header), how should Git notice? It would require a > fsck before accepting any new pack. Pack trailer hash. Apparently dumb HTTP fetch needs to bypass pack to index conversion somehow since index-pack aborts if trailer hash check fails (not to mention other failures corrupt pack may cause). -Ilari -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html