Thomas Rast <trast@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Shawn O. Pearce wrote: > > If the tag is an older-style annotated tag with no tagger date, > > we assume a date stamp of 1 second after the UNIX epoch. > > This patch doesn't seem to actually set this, but as a minor nit: the > '1 second' contradicts the 0 mentioned in the last patch. > > (The effect is the same for all practical purposes.) Whoops. Old commit message from v1. I skim read it knowing I needed to adjust something in the message before reusing it, but didn't see anything, so sent it as-is. Junio, it might make sense to drop the part Thomas quoted above before you apply this. -- Shawn. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html