Git and Linux tarball size evolution

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



http://bouillon.math.usu.ru/files/linux-tarball-evol.png

I plotted sizes of official linux kernel tarballs found at
ftp://ftp.kernel.org against their dates. (Yep, the methodology is
extremely dirty.)
Long story short: the normal dynamics of Linux development is
accelerated growth. Apparently, in the end of 2002, development hits
some limit, probably a scalability problem. It returns to the
accelerated mode in mid-2005, which event coincides with the
introduction of git (pointed by the arrow).
Speculation: indeed, the git lets development scale.

It is clear that git has changed the release pattern. But was it the
reason why the development (and tarball size) returned to accelerated
growth? Another possible interpretation is that 2.5->2.6 stage
involved too much of reengineering, so "normal" incremental
development slowed down for a while.
Do git developers have any opinion on that?
Thanks!

-- 
Victor
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]