Re: gitk pays too much attention to file timestamps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 7:36 PM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> gitk is something of a passive observer of the index, which is
> actually something I like about it.  This keeps it relatively fast
> and can be useful when trying to understand other commands.
>
> I am not sure how other people use gitk, though.  Maybe this would
> be worth changing.  For a reference point, another command in a
> very similar situation is ‘git diff’: people who want the speedup
> from avoiding refreshing the index with that command use

Isn't it kind of weird, then, that it bothers to check the stat
information at all?  I'm not sure why I'd want to know accurately
whether or not my file matches the index, but then have gitk fail to
tell me about *what* doesn't match.  If it has to check the stat()
information anyway, isn't it already being slow?

Avery
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]