Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] Document the HTTP transport protocol

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Scott Chacon <schacon@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I understand, it wasn't meant as a criticism, I was just curious why
> this file was never included.  That the series was marked as RFC makes
> sense.  Could I request that this one patch be included?  Or if Shawn
> has a more recent one?

I also understand and I didn't mean to sound as if I took offense.  I very
much appreciate reminders like yours of old discussions and patches that
were basically good but did not reach conclusion at the end to avoid
wasted effort.

A pointer is good, but if you are reviving an old patch, it would be
much easier if you did a resend/forward for people to comment in-line,
by the way.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]