Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 07:50, Eli Barzilay <eli@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Isn't it better to have a way to include files instead?
>
> Probably yes. Programs like Apache HTTPD, rsyslog and others just use
> ${foo}conf.d by convention by supporting config inclusion.
>
> What would be the ideal config syntax for that? AFAICT git-config
> doesn't (yet) support top-level keys so maybe this:
>
> [INCLUDE]
> path = ~/.gitconfig.d/*
>
> Or if top-level support was added:
>
> INCLUDE = ~/.gitconfig.d/*
<bikeshedding mode on>
I think that it would be better to use
include ~/.gitconfig.d/*
<bikeshedding mode off>
--
Jakub Narebski
Poland
ShadeHawk on #git
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html