Miles Bader <miles@xxxxxxx> writes: > Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> As a Porcelain, "git commit" has some leeway to enforce sensible policy on >> the users, and "forbid commit that does not explain anything" is one such >> policy. It is not generally a good idea to expose the full capabilities >> of plumbing to Porcelain if it leads to bad user behaviour, and such >> "artificial" limitations are safety features we do not want to remove. > > Isn't the requirement of using a longish option like > "--allow-empty-message" enough of a warning to users though? Yes, but re-read the part you omitted from your quote, where Ævar makes it sound as if exposing plumbing's flexibility to the Porcelain layer is unconditionally a good thing. My point is it never is. And as you said (and as Sverre alluded to with his --allow-empty), longish option is one way to ensure that we do not unconditionally expose flexibility from the plumbing without thinking. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html