Hey, On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 11:39 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > An obvious enhancement could be to make "http://user@xxxxxxxx/repo.git"; > ask for password lazily. Then such a URL can be used even for an access > that does not need authentication and the user does not have to prompted > for the password each time, which was what you wanted to really solve, no? > > Actually that could not just be an enhancement, but might be a better > alternative solution to the problem, but I haven't thought things > through. Actually, what I want to do is be able to show a single URL that will work for everyone - both read-only and read-write users, so I much prefer the way I wrote the patch. This way, GitHub and kernel.org and whomever else can just publish the one url and it will prompt if they need auth for some reason, and just work if not. I do however agree that if someone _does_ put their username in the url that it should only prompt for the password if it 401s. That should probably be a separate patch, though. Scott -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html