On Wed, 18 Oct 2006 18:31:32 -0500 Charles Duffy <cduffy@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Granted, I'm speaking with my IT hat on here rather than my developer > hat -- but plugins are a pretty clear usability win. Sure they can be. But their value I think is overstated, especially in an open source project where anyone can grab a copy of the source and update it with a trial feature. This updated copy can be wrapped in a nice GUI installer just as easily as any plugin. Now, I suppose plugins let end users mix and match trial features slightly easier, but hopefully your base package isn't so devoid of features that this is honestly necessary. As Petr pointed out, all this comes to Bzr essentially for free since it's a part of python. So be it, but I've yet to hear an example where plugins were anything more than a minor convenience rather than a fundamental win over the way Git is developing. For an example, just look how few lines of git were needed to implement the essential features of the bzr bundle feature. With no plugins or monkey business needed ;o) Sean - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html