Re: What's cooking in git.git (Mar 2010, #06; Wed, 24)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Excerpts from Junio C Hamano's message of Wed Mar 24 20:41:16 -0400 2010:

> * bw/git-completion-rpmspec (2010-03-20) 1 commit
>  - Add a git-completion rpm subpackage to the spec
> 
> Shipping bash-completion as part of RPM package; since Todd
> Zullinger who packages git for Fedora joined the thread, I am hoping
> that I can defer the direction of the final version to the
> discussion between Todd and Ben.

I think Todd made a good case for making this part of the core git
rpm.  Ian's patch would be more suited for inclusion in this case.
The remaining question is whether to stick it in
/etc/bash_completion.d or in /usr/share/bash_completion.d (the
triggers vs direct bit).

The closer the core spec file is to the one that distro's use, the
better.  This is a reciprocal benefit, I think.

I'm still interested in Todd's (and anyone else') thoughts about
adding the git-daemon, etc, sub-packages as part of the stock spec
file.  Are they too distro specific for inclusion?  (eg: which user
should run git-daemon[1]?  default repo/cgi location for gitweb?)

Thanks
-Ben

[1] The fedora spec sees git-daemon run as 'nobody' but imho, this isn't
    a good choice.  A separate 'git' user would be my preference.
-- 
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]