Re: Pseudonymous commits

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 1:00 AM, Mike.lifeguard
<mike.lifeguard@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 10-03-25 01:54 AM, Kris Shannon wrote:
>> Accountability for translations is even more important because review is
>> usually a LOT harder.
>
> I didn't say the translations weren't reviewed, or the translators were
> unaccountable. They are in both cases.

I think the point is that if you don't even have contact information
for them, they can't *really* be accountable.  But of course that's up
to you.

> In any case, is the answer "git can't do that" or not? Because that's
> actually the answer I'm interested in.

Every committer (and author) in git has a (nonempty, I think) name and
an email address, and that's how you identify the committer (and
author).  What you do with those fields is between you and your
project maintainer.

Have fun,

Avery
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]