Re: [PATCH] Test that the 'rebase -i' "reword" command always cherry-picks a commit.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Marc Branchaud wrote:

> Is this more acceptable than adding --no-ff to rebase--interactive?

No, in my opinion the latter is better, and I suspect it will go in. :)

No one has objected to the --no-ff option.  I like it: if someone is
trying to reset the committer date on a collection of patches, I’d
rather they use rebase -f or rebase -i --no-ff than format-patch and am.
It’s cooking in pu for the moment, and from here the natural progression
is to next, master, then maybe maint.

Hope that helps,
Jonathan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]