Re: [PATCH] Use test_expect_success for test setups

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Brian Gernhardt <brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Several tests did not use test_expect_success for their setup
> commands.  Putting these start commands into the testing framework
> means both that errors during setup will be caught quickly and that
> non-error text will be suppressed without -v.

Nice.  Should the one in 4103 be three separate tests?  They seem to be
preparing the set of test input files and are not expected to fail (unless
of course you are futzing with diff-tree, but for that we have t4013).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]