Hi, On Fri, 19 Mar 2010, Avery Pennarun wrote: > On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 19:32, Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> - all those "extra commands" that git-svn supports are considered > >> backwards compatibility, even if they're absolutely obsolete because > >> of newer commands, and therefore will be very hard to justify getting > >> rid of > > > > I don't think this is true. The proposal is to implement > > git-remote-svn, which would allow _native_ interaction with svn > > repositories, so without using 'git svn'. It would allow 'git clone > > svn://example.com/myrepo' and subsequent "git pull"s from that svn > > source. Do you agree that makes (part of) your comments moot, or am I > > missing something? > > I don't know enough about the proposal to comment on this part of the > design. How about reading it? It's on the Wiki. Ciao, Dscho -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html