On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 18 Mar 2010, Martin Langhoff wrote: > >> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Linus Torvalds >> <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Even shorter version: NO. >> >> One thing we all forgot to mention here is that even if it was a good >> idea (which it is not), implementing it means a flag day: changing in >> the pack format, wire protocol and APIs, messing up with compatibility >> with users of pre-flag-day git, and rippling out to all the GUIs, >> frontends and integration scripts out there. > > And nobody yet mentioned what should happen when someone sends a patch > by email. Most commits in git.git originated from a patch sent via > email. Should we start pasting UUIDs in the email body? What if the > cut & paste was quickly done and the UUID is missing a character or two? > Because this does happen. And because this UUID thing is supposed to be > a perfect identity representation then we'll need a .uuidmap to correct > such mistakes of course. > > Better improve on the existing .mailmap instead. If anyone is interested I can send them a .mailmap that fixes a lot of the problems in the kernel tree. It's two years old so it will need updating. > > > Nicolas > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- Jon Smirl jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html