Re: [PATCH] Use diff3 instead of merge in merge-recursive.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Uwe Zeisberger wrote:

> If no error occurs, merge (from rcs 5.7) is nothing but:
> 
>         diff3 -E -am -L label1 -L label2 -L label3 file1 file2 file3 > tmpfile
>         cat tmpfile > file1
> 
> Using diff3 directly saves one fork per conflicting file.

Doesn't xdiff library git uses have diff3/merge equivalent?
Couldn't we use that instead (on less dependency, better performance)?
-- 
Jakub Narebski
Warsaw, Poland
ShadeHawk on #git


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]