Re: [patch 07/15] host-IRIX.patch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Gary V. Vaughan" <git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Irix 6.5 does not define 'sgi', but does define '__sgi'.
>
> Also, Irix 6.5 requires _BSD_TYPES to be defined in order for the BSD
> u_short types et. al. to be declared properly.

If Irix 6.5 defines __sgi and the patch _adds_ "defined(__sgi)" I wouldn't
have to worry too much, but would replacing "defined(sgi)" with the
double-underscore version make somebody who added "defined(sgi)" in the
first place cry, if it was done for different version of Irix that does
define "sgi" (worse yet, but not "__sgi")?

Another natural question is if defining _BSD_TYPES everywhere has negative
effects on somebody else's platforms, but that is what people on different
platforms will have to apply this patch, test, and report success or
breakage.  Help from the list audience is appreciated.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]