Re: t5505-remote.29 not working correctly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Brandon Casey <brandon.casey.ctr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> The test titled 'remote prune to cause a dangling symref' is
> not linked together with &&'s.  When the &&'s are added, it
> does not complete successfully.

Hmm, it looks like f8948e2 (remote prune: warn dangling symrefs,
2009-02-08) is internally inconsistent.  This is a fix directly on top of
that commit.

I haven't tried merging the result to a more recent codebase, though.

-- >8 --
Subject: [PATCH] warn_dangling_symref(): send the warning to standard error stream

Brandon Casey noticed tht t5505 had accidentally broken its && chain,
hiding inconsistency between the code that writes the warning to the
standard output and the test that expects to see the warning on the
standard error.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 builtin-remote.c  |    2 +-
 refs.c            |    7 ++++---
 refs.h            |    2 +-
 t/t5505-remote.sh |    2 +-
 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/builtin-remote.c b/builtin-remote.c
index ac69d37..e67221d 100644
--- a/builtin-remote.c
+++ b/builtin-remote.c
@@ -789,7 +789,7 @@ static int prune(int argc, const char **argv)
 
 			printf(" * [%s] %s\n", dry_run ? "would prune" : "pruned",
 			       abbrev_ref(refname, "refs/remotes/"));
-			warn_dangling_symref(dangling_msg, refname);
+			warn_dangling_symref(stderr, dangling_msg, refname);
 		}
 
 		/* NEEDSWORK: free remote */
diff --git a/refs.c b/refs.c
index 6eb5f53..a0e7da7 100644
--- a/refs.c
+++ b/refs.c
@@ -286,6 +286,7 @@ static struct ref_list *get_ref_dir(const char *base, struct ref_list *list)
 }
 
 struct warn_if_dangling_data {
+	FILE *fp;
 	const char *refname;
 	const char *msg_fmt;
 };
@@ -304,13 +305,13 @@ static int warn_if_dangling_symref(const char *refname, const unsigned char *sha
 	if (!resolves_to || strcmp(resolves_to, d->refname))
 		return 0;
 
-	printf(d->msg_fmt, refname);
+	fprintf(d->fp, d->msg_fmt, refname);
 	return 0;
 }
 
-void warn_dangling_symref(const char *msg_fmt, const char *refname)
+void warn_dangling_symref(FILE *fp, const char *msg_fmt, const char *refname)
 {
-	struct warn_if_dangling_data data = { refname, msg_fmt };
+	struct warn_if_dangling_data data = { fp, refname, msg_fmt };
 	for_each_rawref(warn_if_dangling_symref, &data);
 }
 
diff --git a/refs.h b/refs.h
index 29bdcec..64a8e62 100644
--- a/refs.h
+++ b/refs.h
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ extern int for_each_remote_ref(each_ref_fn, void *);
 /* can be used to learn about broken ref and symref */
 extern int for_each_rawref(each_ref_fn, void *);
 
-extern void warn_dangling_symref(const char *msg_fmt, const char *refname);
+extern void warn_dangling_symref(FILE *fp, const char *msg_fmt, const char *refname);
 
 /*
  * Extra refs will be listed by for_each_ref() before any actual refs
diff --git a/t/t5505-remote.sh b/t/t5505-remote.sh
index 2067dc5..2cad416 100755
--- a/t/t5505-remote.sh
+++ b/t/t5505-remote.sh
@@ -415,7 +415,7 @@ test_expect_success 'remote prune to cause a dangling symref' '
 	) 2>err &&
 	grep "has become dangling" err &&
 
-	: And the dangling symref will not cause other annoying errors
+	: And the dangling symref will not cause other annoying errors &&
 	(
 		cd seven &&
 		git branch -a
-- 
1.7.0.2.445.g0ae494
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]