On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 07:50, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Robin Rosenberg <robin.rosenberg@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> Did something pop up that I don't know of that prevented inclusion of this >> patch, other than the NSEC option, or will it do if just refresh the patch? > > I think all of us liked the general direction, and also all of us agreed > that we would want to keep NSEC support that was removed by Linus's patch. > > Nobody had time or inclination to update the patch to implement the > consensus (I still had the thread in my inbox, by the way). So "just > refresh the patch" would be the necessary first step. There is an awful lot of "trust-something" variables. Maybe they can be consolidated into a bitmask/bitfields? And a config option taking a list of filesystem features which can be trusted for a good measure (preserving old "trust_something" options, of course). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html