Re: [PATCH] rebase--interactive: don't enforce valid branch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 14 Mar 2010, Junio C Hamano wrote:

There's already a test for rebasing on a previously detached HEAD.  The
form "git rebase -i HEAD~2" specifies a non-branch upstream, but doesn't
take the branch argument which is the point of the change.

What I meant was that if you prefer to work on a detached HEAD (and I
sometimes do), then your HEAD would likely to be detached already when you
run rebase.  IOW, I would expect that

	git checkout HEAD^0
       ... perhaps do something, perhaps do nothing, here ...
       git rebase -i HEAD~2

would be a lot more natural thing to do, and in that case you do not need
to say HEAD^0 there.

That functionality already works.  It's certainly possible to do it as
you describe, but why require the extra step?  git-rebase already
supports detaching as part of its behavior, but rebase -i does not.
It may seem nitpicky, but it's asymmetric and occasionally it's handy
syntax.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]