Hi,
You got it right. HTML and man branches are really very good examples.
Regards
2010/3/13 Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> Side note: The other two "disjoint" merges we have are also this kind
>> of "no common paths" merge. Nobody who was involved in the branches
>> that resulted in them prepared his branch with --orphan, by the way.
>> They started out in independent repositories, because they were by
>> definition independent projects and these were "cross project merges",
>> as Linus put it.
>
> Note that beside "disjoint" merges ("cross project merges"), of gitk,
> git-gui, gitweb and (very early in git history) git mail tools, there
> are also three "disjoint"/"unparented" branches: 'html', 'man' and
> 'todo'.
>
> While 'todo' is totally unrelated, and if instead of starting in
> separate repository it would be created using proposed feature, it
> would be created with "no common paths" case.
>
> BUT in the case of 'html' and 'man' branches I could see why current
> implementation of _removing index and not removing files_ might be
> advantageous. Remove index, create HTML and manpage version of
> documentation, and add HTML (in 'html' branch) or manpages (in 'man'
> branch)... probably shifting root, so it is not all in single
> Documentation directory.
>
> Just my 2 eurocents.
>
> --
> Jakub Narebski
> Poland
> ShadeHawk on #git
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html