Petr Baudis wrote: > Dear diary, on Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 03:36:36AM CEST, I got a letter > where Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> said that... >> Petr Baudis wrote: >> >>> so that you can add your own views, so that git-browser can >>> integrate to it more reasonably. (Currently it has completely different >>> UI and you have to patch gitweb in order to get the proper links at >>> proper places.) Sure, git-browser might get fully integrated to gitweb >>> later but that needs to be done sensitively so that people are not >>> scared by the horrible javascript blobs, etc.; currently git-browser is >>> very experimental, and adding it would be quite intrusive. >> >> I was thinking about adding using JavaScript, in shortlog (and perhaps >> shortlog-extended, i.e. with date and author) views one extra "diagram" >> column, with width set using JavaScript generated embedded style, and use >> only part of git-browser that generates diagram to draw it there. > > Shortlog is paginated and that's not very practical for diagrams, I > think - you need to gradually extend it instead in that case. But yes, > keeping the _visual_ difference of git-browser and gitweb as small as > possible has been the main reason for me to think about integrating it > more tightly. You can have paginated graph (diagram). Although it is more natural to have diagram on the first page only, just like gitk --max-count=100. The idea is for gitweb to generate (short)log, perhaps with pagination turned off (CSS overflow: scroll), and git-browser part to generate diagram and add it to log. -- Jakub Narebski Poland - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html