> Traditionally the right way to do this has been to make a temporary commit > on the branch, i.e. I would like to avoid such commits for unfinished content updates. Should the storage operation be provided by the stash instead for intermediate work results? Will it happen to forget corresponding clean-up for "temporary" changes that might be committed too early just to get them stored? Regards, Markus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html