On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 05:20:44PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > * cw/test-lib-relicense (2010-02-22) 1 commit > . test-lib.sh: Add explicit license detail, with change from GPLv2 to GPLv2+. > > I think a reasonable way forward would be to collect Acks from > everybody who appears on "git blame" or "git shortlog" output. Somehow I am number 4 on "git shortlog -ns" for test-lib.sh, despite having contributed only a tiny number of lines. :) But certainly I am fine with re-licensing it. > How do people feel about relicensing the whole (except for the > obviously borrowed bits, such as xdiff/) under GPLv2 _or later_? I am > not a big fan of GPLv3 and do not see a compelling reason to switch to > v3 for the sake of v3 license per-se, but helping others that want to > use our code might tip the balance. I have no problem with re-licensing my contributions. -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html