Hi, On Tue, 23 Feb 2010, Sverre Rabbelier wrote: > On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 14:03, Johannes Schindelin > <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote: > > May I caution against allowing "+" as part of filenames? On Windows, > > thanks to the DOS garb^Wheritage, "+" is not really allowed... > > Would it be safe to say "raplce all occurences of '+' and '.' with > '-'? I'd rather only replace '+' with '-'. While "short" DOS filenames can only have one dot, and only up to three (upper-case) characters after that, "long" ones do not share that restriction. > Is it feasible that we would want to support two protocols with a > different helper that map to the same 'name' using that scheme? So, > would there ever be a case where we want to handle "bzr+ssh" and > "bzr-ssh" with a different helper? I reckon not, and if it does occur > it's always possible to put a simple dispatcher in between? Possible. Ciao, Dscho -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html