On Monday 22 February 2010 01:25:02 Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Thomas Rast <trast@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > core.notesRef should be in that list
> > implicitly, and I think the natural position if it is unsorted would
> > be: first.
>
> I think that is a sane thing to do, and then any additional ones can come
> after that first one, in the order specified by displayRef. Isn't that
> what you are doing, no?
Yes, I just wanted to spell out why I originally decided for the
sorted instead of user-ordered way:
> > However, that means that changing core.notesRef or GIT_NOTES_REF
> > can shuffle around your notes, which I thought would be confusing.
But that wasn't a strong preference at all, so doing it like you
suggested (and like the code is in v4) is fine by me.
--
Thomas Rast
trast@{inf,student}.ethz.ch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html