On Monday 22 February 2010 01:25:02 Junio C Hamano wrote: > Thomas Rast <trast@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > core.notesRef should be in that list > > implicitly, and I think the natural position if it is unsorted would > > be: first. > > I think that is a sane thing to do, and then any additional ones can come > after that first one, in the order specified by displayRef. Isn't that > what you are doing, no? Yes, I just wanted to spell out why I originally decided for the sorted instead of user-ordered way: > > However, that means that changing core.notesRef or GIT_NOTES_REF > > can shuffle around your notes, which I thought would be confusing. But that wasn't a strong preference at all, so doing it like you suggested (and like the code is in v4) is fine by me. -- Thomas Rast trast@{inf,student}.ethz.ch -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html