On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 11:39:04 +0100 (CET), Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, Michal Sojka wrote: > > > as you can read bellow, I'd like to use git's test-lib.sh in a GPLv3 > > project. Do you mind if I use your work in that file under GPLv3? > > I do not mind, but I would like to ask that you contribute the > improvements back under GPLv2. Thanks everyone for your agreement. And yes, we'll contribute back any improvements under GPLv2. I think the most clear step forward would be for test-lib.sh to be updated in the git repository with an explicit licensing blurb reflecting this agreement. The most convenient would be something using the standard language of "either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version". Then, any generic improvements we make within notmuch, (such as a --tap option or whatever), I'll be sure to pass on to the git community. Thanks again, -Carl
Attachment:
pgpp3nK08Nao3.pgp
Description: PGP signature