also sprach Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@xxxxxxxxx> [2010.02.19.1206 +1300]: > > I am aware of notes, but so far I stayed away from them, simply > > because it seems hackish to represent tag trees as text when dealing > > with a tool that is essentially all about trees and refs. > > I think you're using the wrong definition of hacky vs. elegant. A > "tree" is really just a file containing a list of objects. A "ref" is > just a file that contains an object id. > > So checking in a file that contains a list of object ids (or > filenames) is perfectly appropriate. Indeed. But Git provides a lot of tools to manipulate all those, which I would not be able to reuse in the text-file approach. -- martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/ "good advice is something a man gives when he is too old to set a bad example. -- la rouchefoucauld spamtraps: madduck.bogus@xxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)