Re: On blame/pickaxe

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Josef Weidendorfer wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> this blame-passing thing really looks very promising and powerful.
> 
> On Monday 16 October 2006 08:43, you wrote:
>> If the user is not prepared to see code movement, pickaxe can be
>> run without -M nor -C to get the classic blame output.
> 
> Another blame-passing heuristic would be very interesting for code:
> "Ignore white-space changes".
> This way, commits which only do some reindentations simply are skipped.
> 
> It looks like such a thing would just be a matter of passing "-b" to
> executions of "diff" in the blame-passing algorithm.

I am thinking that that is probabally going to need to be optional, for
example python the indentation is everything to the meaning of the code.

-apw
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]