On Sun, 14 Feb 2010, skillzero@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sun, 14 Feb 2010, skillzero@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > >> Is there a way to have git maintain a single reflog across all > >> branches (and stashes)? I switch between branches, create and delete > >> branches, stash save and pop, etc. frequently and it would be great > >> for me if there was a way to have a global reflog that showed every > >> operation, independent of a particular branch. Is there some way to > >> enable this? > > > > You have it already. It is the "HEAD" reflog. > > I don't seem to see any stash activity. For example, I made a test > change, did git stash, and then git stash pop. When I do git reflog, I > don't see the stash commit or the delete of the stash. Is there a way > to enable that? It is true that stash doesn't touch HEAD. So logically the stash operations should not end up in the HEAD reflog. But maybe creating a reflog only for stashed states could be a good thing. I personally don't use stash that much since I've grown the habit of saving temporary states to a temporary branch before git-stash even existed, which in that case is always captured by the HEAD reflog. Nicolas