Re: [PATCH] Add an optional argument for --color options

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mark Lodato wrote:

> Just wondering, why does diff use a separate option parsing mechanism
> than the rest of the code?  Would it be worthwhile to switch to
> parse_opt?

Historical reasons, I think.  And yes. ;-)

> Perhaps I can throw the tests in Jonathan's "tests for automatic use
> of pager", t7006-pager?  Or, create a new test that mimics his?

I would suggest copying whatever functions you need to a new
lib-terminal.sh and sourcing that with . from a new test.  Then I
could adapt t7006-pager to use your library and avoid duplication of
code.

I am also interested in feedback on the techniques used in that test.
Should it just rely on redirects to /dev/tty instead, and work to
avoid sending any actual output there?  Is there an easier way to
detect use of color?

Jonathan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]