Re: GSoC 2010

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Fri, 12 Feb 2010, Mike Hommey wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 10:03:43AM +0100, Sverre Rabbelier wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 10:02, Johannes Schindelin
> > <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Would it not make sense to implement git-remote-svn as a C program? 
> > > That should help matters especially on Windows, where git-svn is 
> > > very slow due to its using MSys (which is a stripped-down Cygwin, as 
> > > you know, jumping through hoops to bring some POSIX-iness to 
> > > Windows).
> > 
> > It would very much be sense to do so, perhaps we should update the 
> > wiki to say that implementing it in C is strongly preferred?
> 
> It is already mentioned on the wiki that this would probably be a 
> problem, license-wise. (the svn library is Apache license, which is 
> incompatible with GPLv2)

So git-remote-svn would have to be under an Apache-compatible license, so 
what? It is not as if git-remote-svn was a derivative work of Git, just 
because it abides by a very simple command-line interface that happens to 
be defined in Git, but would work anywhere else, too.

Ciao,
Dscho

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]