Re: [RFC] submodule+shallow clone feature request

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Wed, 10 Feb 2010, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > Yes. Note, though, that the problems of enhancing git-submodule are 
> > not technical, as we can learn from the recent history, including the 
> > lack of support for rebasing submodules (there _were_ patches!).
> 
> Sorry I don't recall.  Were they of 'next' quality?  How well were they 
> reviewed?

Obviously not, otherwise you would have applied them, no?

OTOH I found the technical details rather trivial, so maybe they were 
'next' quality, but there was another reason you did not apply them.

I just know that from my daily workflow, I deeply miss rebasing 
submodules. But then, I listed the issues I have with submodules, and this 
list was welcomed with unbelievable enthusiasm.

Ciao,
Dscho

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]