Re: Better cooperation between checkouts and stashing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@xxxxxx> writes:

>>
>> We _can_ start experimenting with an option (similar to "checkout -m"),
>> which does:
>>   
>
> Does the documentation need any improvements on the dependencies between
> the mentioned subfunctions?

Sorry, you lost me.  I did say and still think that it would be good to
have in the documentation a separate section that teaches the users what
happens to their uncommitted changes when checking out a different branch
(or an unnamed branch).  But I am at loss guessing what dependencies among
what "subfunctions" you are talking about.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]